Rural housing in the municipalities of Pacho - Cundinamarca (Colombia) and Tlatlaya
- State of Mexico (Mexico)
Vivienda rural en los municipios de Pacho - Cundinamarca (Colombia) y Tlatlaya - Estado de
México (México)
Ledys Daniela Patrón de la Cruz
Estudiante de Ingeniería Civil Universidad de la
Costa- Colombia
lpatron@cuc.edu.co
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9877-9969
Vanessa Morales Ramírez
Ingeniera Civil
Universidad Mexiquense del Bicentenario- México
vanessa_990311@hotmail.com
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8732-5673
Constanza Dorey García Puentes
Ingeniera Civil, Magister en Gestión de la
Innovación
Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios-
Colombia
cgarciap@uniminuto.edu.co
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4684-9750
Abstract
This article presents the results of the theoretical-descriptive research of documentary type, whose
objective was to make a diagnosis of housing in the municipality of Pacho - Cundinamarca
(Colombia) and Tlatlaya - State of Mexico (Mexico), from the analysis of the results of the housing
deficit in Colombia (DANE) and social backwardness in Mexico (INEGI), in addition to deepen
concepts of housing, construction systems and sustainability in different documents consulted in
databases such as Google Scholar, Scielo, Redalyc. The municipality of Pacho has approximately
8,856 homes of which 44.1% are in housing deficit and in the case of Tlatlaya there are
approximately 8,561 inhabited homes, of which 62% are estimated to be in social backwardness;
for these two municipalities there are similarities in the materials and construction systems of the
housing within which predominates the floor in earth or cement, adobe or brick walls and roofs in
sheet or asbestos-cement. From the analysis, it is possible to recognize the design and construction
processes, seeking that the houses are decent, safe, sustainable and respond to the needs of the
population, respecting the cultural and traditional aspects of each context, seeking an equitable
development in the communities of the two countries.
lpatron@cuc.edu.co
http://centrosuragraria.com/index.php/revista, Published by: Edwards Deming Institute,
Quito - Ecuador, October - December vol. 1. Num. 15. 2022, This work is licensed under
a Creative Commons License, Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.es
Received February 17, 2022
Approved: May 11, 2022
Mendieta, Bonilla 2022
October - December vol. 1. Num. 15, 2022
Key words: Human Settlement, Community, Decent Housing, Sustainable Development.
Resumen
Este articulo presenta los resultados sobre la investigación teórico-descriptiva de tipo documental,
cuyo objetivo fue realizar un diagnóstico de la vivienda en el municipio de Pacho Cundinamarca
(Colombia) y Tlatlaya - Estado de México (México), a partir del análisis de los resultados del
déficit habitacional en Colombia (DANE) y rezago social en México (INEGI), además profundizar
conceptos de vivienda, sistemas constructivos y sostenibilidad en diferentes documentos
consultados en bases de datos como Google Scholar, Scielo, Redalyc. El municipio de Pacho
cuenta con aproximadamente 8.856 hogares de los cuales el 44,1% se encuentran en déficit
habitacional y en el caso de Tlatlaya hay aproximadamente 8.561 viviendas habitadas, de las cuales
se estiman se encuentran en rezago social el 62%; para estos dos municipios se encuentran
similitudes en los materiales y sistemas constructivos de la vivienda dentro de los cuales predomina
el piso en tierra o cemento, muros en adobe o ladrillo y techos en lamina o asbesto-cemento. A
partir del análisis se logra reconocer los procesos de diseño y construcción, buscando que las
viviendas sean dignas, seguras, sostenibles y respondan a las necesidades de la población,
respetando los aspectos culturales y tradicionales de cada contexto, en procura de un desarrollo
equitativo en las comunidades de los dos países.
Palabras clave: Asentamiento humano, Comunidad, Vivienda digna, Desarrollo Sostenible.
Introduction
Professor Jesús Velázquez Lozano (2007) defines housing as an enclosed and covered space
that provides protection and security to its inhabitants from climatic agents, as well as privacy
and development of their identity, constitutes the basis of the family patrimony and must be
functional to the needs of the inhabitants. In the case of rural housing, it is defined by García
and Aristizábal (2020) as a construction that mainly provides protection for its inhabitants,
especially from climatic conditions, and also includes anthropological and psychosocial
aspects, thus relating to the natural, cultural and social context of the particular region where it
is located; its distribution and conformation of spaces depends on the needs of its inhabitants.
Therefore, apart from being a physical element that provides protection and shelter, the house
is also a scenario where the social fabric is developed and strengthened, represents the culture
and tradition of the farmers and is an agribusiness scenario.
It should be noted that the right to adequate housing is recognized in international human rights
law as an integral element of the right to an adequate standard of living. Therefore, the
habitability of housing must be guaranteed by identifying the physical, sociocultural and
environmental aspects of the areas to be built or intervened, in order to determine their
architectural, installation and structural characteristics, and ensure that they are decent,
sustainable and safe. Unfortunately, the concentration of the population in Latin America is in
the cities, which influences the adequate administrative development of the countries, since
108
these efforts are concentrated in the cities and the rural sector is somehow left behind; it is
essential to establish strategies that reduce the gaps between these two sectors, to promote
equitable development among the population and especially access to decent housing (Garcia-
Puentes and Bernal-López, 2022; Sánchez, De La Cruz-De La Cruz, López-Becerril, Arana-
Ovalle, 2021; and Garcia-Palacios and Moyano-Estrada, 2020).
On the one hand, in Colombia, according to projections of the National Administrative
Department of Statistics (DANE), there is an approximate population of 50,372,424 inhabitants
by 2020, with a territorial extension of 1,141,748,000 inhabitants, composed of 32 departments,
one of which is the department of Cundinamarca, located in the center of Colombia on a high
plateau of the eastern mountain range and covering eastern and western flanks.
km!
One of
them is the department of Cundinamarca, located in the center of Colombia in a high plateau
of the eastern mountain range and covers the eastern and western flanks of the same, has a
population of 2,792,877 inhabitants (DANE, 2020), being the fourth most populated
department of the country, it has a land area of 240.06
km!
240.06 of which 15415.94
km!
It is
composed of 116 municipalities, among which the municipality of Pacho is highlighted in this
research, which is located in the north-west of the department of Cundinamarca and has a
rugged topography, with various branches of the Eastern Cordillera that run through its territory
of 403.04 hectares, i.e., 40,304 hectares of land with a population of 2,792,892,877 inhabitants
(DANE, 2020).
km!
The administrative distribution of the area is 72 territorial spaces with
characteristics typical of the mountainous zone of the eastern cordillera defined by its altitude
in four thermal floors: Paramo, cold, temperate and warm. According to the DANE projection
(2020), it has a total population of 25,803 inhabitants, of which 14,127 live in the town and
11,676 in the town and rural areas.
On the other hand, according to the National Institute of Statistics and Geography (INEGI),
Mexico has a population of approximately 126,014,024 inhabitants and a territorial extension
of 1,964,375,000 inhabitants.
km!"
1,964,375, and when adding the Exclusive Economic Zone
of the territorial sea, which covers 3,149,920
km!
3,149,920, the country's total surface area is
5,114,295,000 square meters.
#km!
Its political division is composed of 32 federal entities, of
which the State of Mexico is located in the central zone and is divided into 125 municipalities,
with a population of 16,992,418 people (INEGI, 2020); of this population, 87% lives in urban
localities and 13% in rural localities, with a territorial extension of 22,499,953,920.
km!
Of the
total area, 38.1% is agricultural, 34.9% forestry, 16.7% livestock, 10.3% industrial and urban;
in terms of land tenure, 40.32% is ejido. In the southwest zone of the State of Mexico is located
the municipality of Tlatlaya, which stands out in the present investigation, it is divided by the
municipal seat, 25 towns and 183 rancherías, in addition its territory amounts to 788.6
km!
The
climate in Tlatlaya is cold, temperate and warm and according to INEGI (2020) it has a total
population of 31,762 inhabitants.
The National Population and Housing Census 2018 revealed that in Colombia of the
14,060,645 households in total, 5,144,445 million households have housing deficit or social
Mendieta, Bonilla 2022
October - December vol. 1. Num. 15, 2022
lag, structural and non-structural, representing 36.59% of Colombian households. In Mexico,
according to INEGI, there are 34,892,977 homes, of which 8,504,424 have a housing deficit or
social backwardness, whether structural or non-structural, which represents 24.4% of the
homes in that country. For the department of Cundinamarca the census of households is
945,601, of which 280,849 should improve their housing conditions, which would represent a
percentage of 29.71% and for the State of Mexico with information from INEGI (2020), it was
known that there are 4,481,007 total homes, of which 639,104 should improve their housing
conditions representing 14.3% of homes in the state. It should be taken into account that, in the
municipality of Pacho there are 8,856 total households, of which 3,906 have deficiencies, in
the rural sector there are approximately 3,562 families of which 2,833 have their own housing
and 729 do not, (Alcadia municipio de Pacho, 2020). As for the municipality of Tlatlaya it was
found that there are a total of 8,561 dwellings, the average number of occupants of the dwelling
is 3.7%.
According to research, there are risk factors that affect human health in housing, such as
inadequate construction materials, inadequate water storage and consequent contamination,
among others. This is why it is important to analyze and compare the housing deficit or social
backwardness, construction systems and housing design criteria in communities, taking into
account the principles of sustainability to meet current needs and safeguard future generations.
It is worth highlighting that, the countries of Colombia and Mexico have proposed public
housing policies with the objective of adequately solving the housing deficiencies of rural
households, to ensure access to decent housing, as stated by Olvera De La Cruz Miriam
Monserrat (2018), that is, housing that allows its inhabitants to lead a healthy, safe and
sustainable life to develop a life project in the countryside; although these efforts have not been
sufficient for the population of the rural sector in the two countries to enjoy adequate minimum
conditions of habitability in their homes.
Likewise, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are tools to eradicate poverty and deal
with climate change that go hand in hand with the preservation of resources for future
generations, in this case goal 11.- sustainable cities and communities, specifically in goal 11.1,
which seeks to ensure that all housing is safe and affordable, as well as sustainable for a better
comfort of those who live in them, which should be included in the national public policy to
achieve better settlements and thus obtain a better quality of life and conserve natural resources.
In this sense, this study was aimed at carrying out a theoretical characterization of the physical,
sociocultural and environmental aspects of regions in Colombia (Cundinamarca) and Mexico
(State of Mexico) related to housing, which allows identifying in the literature the architectural,
installation, and structural characteristics of rural housing, analyzing the climatic, social and
cultural conditions in Pacho- Cundinamarca (Colombia), Tlatlaya-State of Mexico (Mexico),
from the principles of sustainability, and structural characteristics of rural housing analyzing
the climatic, social and cultural conditions in Pacho- Cundinamarca (Colombia), Tlatlaya-State
of Mexico (Mexico), from the principles of sustainability, thus allowing to classify the data
110
obtained from national, departmental or state and municipal surveys to qualify and quantify the
deficiencies of housing in the chosen municipalities.
Materials and methods
This is a theoretical-descriptive research of documentary type for which it was carried out
tracking, organization, systematization and analysis of electronic documents on housing,
housing deficit in Colombia and social backwardness in Mexico covering the period of time
between 2011 and 2021. For this purpose, the search was carried out through search channels
such as Google Scholar, Scielo, DANE, INEGI, CONAVI, CONPES, Redalyc, Gobernación
de Cundinamarca, municipality of Pacho, municipality of Tlatlaya, UAEM institutional
repository. It was possible to find important documents such as the National Population and
Housing Census in Colombia 2018, Social Gap and National Census of Mexico 2021,
Departmental or State and Municipal development plan, articles in specialized databases,
National Policy on Sustainable Buildings, undergraduate and graduate theses and previous
research that allowed to go deeper into the topics of interest. The organization consisted of
making matrices in Excel, where the information collected was recorded, in order to make a
comparative analysis of the information obtained from the two municipalities under study. For
the systematization of the search criteria, the following terms were included: Human
Settlement, Community, Decent Housing, Sustainable Development.
The sample for this study corresponded to homes located in the municipalities of Pacho-
Cundinamarca (Colombia) and Tlatlaya-State of Mexico (Mexico), where according to
national, departmental or state and municipal censuses, households with housing shortages
were identified, which allowed the classification of housing characteristics, such as wall and
floor materials, overcrowding, basic services, and other variables that were analyzed through
3 methods incorporating Excel tables, such as: Registration of documents found in the different
databases with information of interest of the topics to be addressed in the research to perform
a theoretical characterization on the physical, socio-cultural and environmental aspects of
regions in Colombia (Cundinamarca) and Mexico (State of Mexico) related to housing,
classification of qualitative and quantitative variables found for housing as architectural,
facilities, and structural characteristics of rural dwellings analyzing the characteristics of rural
dwellings, and structural characteristics of rural housing analyzing the climatic, social and
cultural conditions in Pacho-Cundinamarca (Colombia), Tlatlaya-State of Mexico (Mexico),
from the principles of sustainability, diagnosis of similarities and differences of housing in
Pacho-Cundinamarca and Tlatlaya-State of Mexico classifying the data obtained from national,
departmental or state and municipal surveys to qualify and quantify the deficiencies of housing
in these municipalities.
Mendieta, Bonilla 2022
October - December vol. 1. Num. 15, 2022
Result
Housing in Tlatlaya-State of Mexico
Rural housing in Mexico has different typologies and presents an urban morphology that is
immersed in different contexts and social realities, while most of the urban area was once rural
towns dedicated to agriculture and livestock (Torres Veytia, E., Vega Díaz, L., & Higuera
Meneses, C., 2011). Currently, rural areas are increasingly affected by not having decent
housing, from the lack of security due to houses built of wood or adobe and sheet metal that
would not withstand a natural disaster, to not having the necessary services such as electricity,
drinking water and drainage, so that the inhabitants are more prone to disease and their quality
of life is affected by these factors.
According to INEGI, a population is considered rural when it has less than 2,500 inhabitants,
while urban is that where more than 2,500 people live, in this case the National Autonomous
University of Mexico (UNAM) has addressed the analysis and prospects of sustainable rural
housing in Mexico. In this regard Vázquez (2013), points out that the states with the highest
number of people living in communities with less than 2,500 inhabitants are Veracruz, Oaxaca,
Chiapas, State of Mexico, Puebla and Guanajuato; According to CONAPO (National
Population Council), some criteria taken into account for differentiating between urban and
rural Mexico are that rural areas are identified with a population distributed in small scattered
settlements, with a low ratio between the number of inhabitants and the area they occupy, as
well as a predominance of primary activities, rural areas are characterized by small, close-knit
communities and because, unlike cities, the space available for green areas is not small. rural
areas tend to be more dependent on natural resources and organic materials, where the
environment does not suffer great damage and life tends to be more peaceful and relaxed; It
should be noted that earth is considered as a basic and ecological construction material, a
resource that has a great impact on cultural roots, because it is the traditional materialization
means of housing that suffers a technological and cultural discredit due to a gradual loss of
knowledge of its properties and the empirical practice in its use requires social management
processes and technological innovation to project it as the most important material resource of
the rural habitat. (Calla García, A. 2007)
Mexico covers a territorial extension of 1,964,375
km!
1,964,375, of which 1,959,248
km!
1,959,248 are continental and 5,127
km!
5,127 are insular surface. To this territory must
be added the Exclusive Economic Zone of the territorial sea, which covers 3,149,920,000 sq.
km.
km!
3,149,920, bringing the country's total surface area to 5,114,295,000 square meters.
km!
. The capital of Mexico is the Federal District (Mexico City), the political division of
Mexico is composed of 32 states and has a population of 126,014,024 people and its population
density is 64.3 inhabitants/km2 , so that there are 34,892,977 homes, of which 24.4% or
8,504,424 were identified as being in conditions of Housing Backlog.
112
The state of Mexico is located in the central zone of the Mexican Republic at an altitude of
2,683 meters above sea level, in its highest plain which is the Toluca valley, its territorial
extension of the state is 22,351.8
km!
of the total area, 38.1% is agricultural, 34.9% forestry,
16.7% livestock, 10.3% industrial and urban; in terms of land tenure, 40.32% is ejido. The
average annual temperature is 14.7°C, 73% of the state has a temperate sub-humid climate,
located in the high valleys of the north, center and east; 21% is warm sub-humid and is located
towards the southwest, 6% is dry and semi-dry, present in the northeast, and 0.16% has a cold
climate, located in the high parts of the volcanoes.
The State of Mexico has 125 municipalities, with information from INEGI 2020 it was obtained
that the State of Mexico ranks 1st nationally for its number of inhabitants 16,992,418, of which
8,741,123 are women and 8,251,295 are men. The population of the State of Mexico lives in:
87 % urban localities and 13 % rural localities, in the state of Mexico the total number of
dwellings is 4,481,007 and the social backwardness is 14.3%, i.e. 639.104 and the materials
with which the houses are built are: 63.3% of firm or cement floor, 96.8% walls of brick, brick,
block, stone, quarry, cement or concrete and 89.6% concrete roofs or joists with vaults and the
services they have are: 75.1% have piped water inside the house, 99.6% have electricity and
86.5% have drainage connected to the public network.
The municipality of Tlatlaya is located in the southwestern part of the State of Mexico, and
according to information from the Constitutional City Council of Tlatlaya (2022-2024), it is
made up of the municipal seat, 25 towns and 183 rancherías; its territorial division is made up
of 117 delegations. Its municipal seat is located within the geographic coordinates 18°37'01"
north latitude and between the meridians 100º12'27" west longitude of the Greenwich meridian.
Its territory amounts to 788.6
km!
788.6 hectares, which represents 3.5% of the state. The
predominant climate in Tlatlaya is classified as sub-humid tropical climate, of course with
summer rains. It also depends on the seasons of the year and according to the altitude where
we are located, for these reasons we have cold, temperate and warm climates. Summer is the
season that is bountiful for the farmer, plants and trees are renewed, especially agriculture is
promoted by planting corn, beans and pumpkins. In autumn the farmer harvests corn, sesame,
beans, pumpkin and some are dedicated to the sugar cane harvest or piloncillo.
In relation to the surface area occupied for rural production, Tlatlaya is the second municipality
with the second highest proportion destined for the use of agricultural production units,
pastureland, pastures, forests and areas lacking vegetation; there are 3,047 agricultural
production units, 1,680 refer to agriculture and self-consumption among the population, with
a population of approximately 31,762 inhabitants and a population density of 40.3
inhabitants/ha.
km!
. It should be noted that the total number of particularly inhabited dwellings
is 8,561, of which 7.3% are dwellings with dirt floors. The availability of services and
equipment in the houses is 34.3% of piped water, 89.1% of drainage, 90.1% of sanitary service,
98.9% of electric energy.
Mendieta, Bonilla 2022
October - December vol. 1. Num. 15, 2022
As mentioned above, of the total number of private homes inhabited in Tlataya, 8,561, it was
estimated that the housing deficit is equal to 62%, taking into account some variables of the
Housing Gap Update of the Population and Housing Census 2020. CONAVI Mexico. In which
there are 3 components, a, b and c. The a are the deteriorated materials where the variables
within this are Walls (Waste material: cardboard sheet; reed, bamboo or palm; in mud or
bajareque) and Roof (Waste material; cardboard sheet; palm or straw). In b are the regular
materials and the variables are walls (asbestos or metal sheet; wood), roof (metal sheet roof;
asbestos sheet; wood or tile; tile) and floor (dirt floor). In the c is the precariousness of spaces
such as overcrowding (more than 2.5 people per room) and service (toilet, no toilet).
The population resides in localities with less than 2,500 inhabitants, being a municipality with
a rural population in dispersed settlements except for the locality of San Pedro Limón, which
is considered an urban settlement because it has 2,503 inhabitants. In the municipality of
Tlatlaya, rural housing is predominant, as well as its construction materials, which range from
deteriorated materials such as cardboard, reed, bamboo or palm leaves; mud, palm or straw, to
regular materials such as asbestos or metallic sheeting; wood, or shingles; roof tiles, for use in
the construction of walls and roofs. In the municipal capital, houses are predominantly built
with brick or brick walls and tile or sheet metal roofs. The average number of occupants per
dwelling is 3.7 and the average number of occupants per room is 1.1. Over the years, the
average number of occupants per dwelling has decreased from 5.43 to 4.72 and finally to 4.37
inhabitants per dwelling in the years 1990-2000-2010.
The environment in the municipality of Tlatlaya is affected in different localities where the
activities of the population are the main cause of the alterations of the resources: air, water and
soil. For example in the larger localities such as: San Pedro Limón, Santa Ana Zicatecoya, San
Antonio del Rosario and Tlatlaya (Municipal Head) where hydrological contamination is given
by the discharge of domiciliary wastewater, since the rivers are used as the drains of the sanitary
infrastructure in addition to the solid waste that the population throws into them, also the use
of fertilizers that erodes the soils, the over exploitation of aquifers, daily activities such as
burning fossil fuels for transportation and the traditional combustion of firewood in domestic
uses. However, the final disposal site for solid waste is in a sanitary landfill located in the
community of Peña Blanca in the western part of the municipality and where the estimated
volume of solid waste collected in 2017 was 4,060 tons and in 2018 it is estimated to have
increased to 4,500 tons of solid waste. Although at this site, efforts are made to provide proper
treatment and separation of garbage, there is a risk of affecting the 48 inhabitants of the
community, due to respiratory and gastrointestinal diseases as in the main urban centers.
According to the National Population and Housing Census conducted by DANE (2020), in the
municipality of Pacho there are 8.856 households in total of which the predominant material
of the exterior walls are rough wood, board or plank, cane, matting or other vegetable and waste
materials; cane, matting or other vegetable and waste materials, as for the material of the floors
are earth, sand or mud and overcrowding of housing can be mitigable (With more than two
people per room to sleep) with an average of 937 homes of the total, unmitigable (Households
114
with more than four people per room to sleep) that apply to 25 homes of the total, and
cohabitation (There are three or more households, or there are more than 6 people in total in
the house) where 65 homes of the total have this characteristic.
It is important to note that the census found that there are 6 "type" dwellings, referring to
container, tent, boat, wagon, cave, natural shelter. On the other hand, it was found that 54
households prepare their food in a space outside the dwelling or do not have an adequate
kitchen for food preparation. Public services are fundamental and play an essential role in
economic and social development, the present investigation showed that of the total number of
homes in the municipality of Pacho 305 homes do not have electricity service, 691 homes in
which the toilet service has no connection; latrine, direct discharge to water sources (low tide),
and 2.641 households obtain water for cooking from a well without a pump, cistern, jaguey or
auger; rainwater; river, stream, spring or birth; carrotanque; aguatero; or bottled or bagged
water. (DANE, 2020).
According to the Pacho Development Plan (2020), to date there is no known census regarding
the use of renewable energies, which differ from conventional use, being almost null the use
of photovoltaic systems due to the difficult economic access by the community (Alcaldía
municipio de Pacho, 2020). Regarding the use of energy in heating and cooking processes for
rural areas, it is common to use firewood from native forests associated with eco-systematic
processes for each of the thermal floors of the municipality, being not only problematic due to
the displacement of fauna, loss of vegetation cover but also corresponding to the emission of
carbon dioxide, particulate matter, among others, that affect the health of the individual in
contact and are part of the factors that increase the incidence in relation to global warming,
leaving aside alternatives such as the construction and implementation of biodigesters as a tool
for the promotion of energy from the use of organic waste. The municipality has deposits of
some minerals for industrial use, such as iron, coal, and rocks used in road maintenance and as
construction material after processing.
Taking into account the above information, it was obtained that the housing deficit or social
gap in the municipality of Pacho is 44.22%, which identifies households living in homes that
have deficiencies and for which it is necessary to add new homes or make interventions so that
they are in the necessary conditions to ensure the habitability of households.
It is worth mentioning that, at the national level there is a public policy oriented to sustainable
housing design, although for the region specifically there is no theoretical evidence of manuals
that propose bioclimatic design (Ministry of Housing, City and Territory, 2020), likewise these
policies lack cohesion and their applicability for the rural sector has been deficient, which
translates into inappropriate housing projects forced to the rural context (Garcia-Puentes and
Bernal-López, 2022).
Sustainability concepts for housing in Mexico
Mendieta, Bonilla 2022
October - December vol. 1. Num. 15, 2022
Some of the sustainability principles that can be taken into account for Tlatlaya's constructions,
to obtain a good habitability, in addition to saving water, gas and electricity in a warm sub-
humid climate with an average annual temperature that is above 20°C, where temperatures
reach more than 35°C in warm seasons (spring and summer) and less than 20°C in cold seasons
(autumn and winter).
According to the Manual for Sustainable Housing, CONAVI 2021 it is important to consider
the following:
Table 1. Variables to consider for sustainable housing. Source: Own elaboration based on the
Manual for sustainable housing, CONAVI (2021).
INDICATORS
Orientation
Home design
Vegetation
Materials to be used
Due to the use of household appliances
Water catchment
116
The above table shows data taken from the manuals of sustainable housing for different
climates of the National Housing Commission (CONAVI) 2021, which are very useful for the
construction, expansion and improvement of housing according to the place where it is located
with respect to climate, in this case we put the most general points that should be taken into
account in each construction and in any climate.
Colombia does not have any type of manuals like these, however, many countries are currently
looking for different strategies to achieve sustainable development and it is expected that this
will also be done in Colombia. On the other hand, the World Commission on Environment and
Development published its report in April 1987, where the concept of sustainable development
is defined for the first time.
"It is up to humanity to make development sustainable, that is, to ensure that it meets the needs
of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.
The concept of sustainable development implies limits (not absolute limits, but limitations
imposed on environmental resources by the present state of technology and social organization,
and the capacity of the biosphere to absorb the effects of human activities); but both technology
and social organization can be managed and improved in such a way as to open the way to a
new era of economic growth [...]" (World Commission on Environment and Development,
1988).
With this concept, we are seeking to meet our needs, but also thinking about not affecting future
generations, so many countries are beginning to work in accordance with the 2030 Agenda for
Sustainable Development and seeking to meet the goals.
Sustainability concepts for housing in Colombia
From the Colombian government, one of the most important steps taken in the recognition of
sustainable construction is the issuance of CONPES 3919 in 2018: National Policy on
Sustainable Buildings. Additionally, sustainability criteria have been formulated at the
regulatory level for the building sector, mostly focused on saving water and energy
consumption. In parallel, there are voluntary certifications in the construction market, which
provide guidelines for projects that seek the possibility of going beyond the minimum
requirements proposed by the standards (Consejo nacional de política económica y social
república de Colombia & departamento nacional de planeación, 2018).
The CONPES 3919 document seeks to promote public policies around sustainable construction
in Colombia, aligned with the fulfillment of the commitments assumed in the international
sustainable development agenda, especially with regard to the fulfillment of the Sustainable
Development Goals (SDGs), with emphasis on goal 11 on sustainable cities and communities.
Mendieta, Bonilla 2022
October - December vol. 1. Num. 15, 2022
Therefore, the national policy for buildings proposed in this CONPES document recognizes
the need to incorporate and promote sustainability criteria in buildings of all types of use.
However, in the current regulations there is a weak inclusion of sustainability criteria in the
life cycle stages of buildings (i.e. design, construction, operation, and use), both new and used.
Among its objectives, specific actions for buildings are highlighted, including the inclusion of
information systems, the construction of baselines for water and energy savings, and the
reduction of deforestation. It should be noted that the benefits associated with sustainable
buildings are numerous and involve society as a whole. In addition, they cover the investment
extensively, both from the financial approach and from the environmental and social benefit
approach.
Likewise, within the framework of the Urban Environmental Management Policy, the Ministry
of Environment and Sustainable Development (2012), developed and published the document
"Environmental Criteria for the Design and Construction of Urban Housing", which contains a
set of environmental management proposals with a mainly preventive approach, since it
focuses on the identification and definition of management proposals for the main
environmental problems of urban housing, related to soil, water, energy and materials. This
document includes general proposals for the planning, design, construction and use of housing,
thus defining guidelines that not only contribute to the protection and conservation of the
environment, but also to the health and quality of life of the Colombian population, especially
the most vulnerable groups.
The fundamental principles of sustainable architecture were applied to the topics defined in the
document in order to establish the efficient use of resources in relation to the mitigation of the
environmental impact generated and the quality and comfort required for the best quality of
urban housing. The proposal of environmental criteria for the design and construction of urban
housing is based on four main axes: Water, Soil, Energy and Materials; these being primary
components of the building and the strong interrelation between them, since the lack or
deficiency of any of them directly affects the habitability conditions and environmental
sustainability of housing.
These criteria are intended to guide the inclusion of integral guidelines throughout the life cycle
of buildings and, within this same framework of ideas, use should be made of the integral
sustainability of a building, which refers to the incorporation of differential instruments (urban,
rural, climatological zone) that should be adapted to the particular characteristics of each
building (existing new conservation, among others).
The proposed criteria focus mainly on three objectives:
Rationalizing the use of renewable natural resources
Substitute with alternative systems or resources
Managing and minimizing the environmental impact produced
118
Throughout the research, the similarity in the terms housing deficit and social backwardness is
identified, since in Colombia the housing deficit is composed of the quantitative deficit and the
qualitative deficit, each of these dimensions has its own components, which identify
households living in deficient housing; In Mexico, the social gap is a weighted measure that
summarizes four indicators of social deprivation (education, health, basic services and housing
space) in a single index that aims to order the units of observation according to their social
deprivation. It is not a poverty measurement, since it does not include income, social security
and food indicators. Considering this, it is recognized that the objective of the housing deficit
or social backwardness is to quantify the deficiencies of households, which is composed of
some similar variables, such as the material of floors and walls, overcrowding and public
services.
In Colombia, according to the National Population and Housing Census 2018 the total number
of households is 14,060,645, with a housing deficit or social gap is 36.59% and in Mexico
according to the National Institute of Statistics and Geography, there is a housing deficit or
social gap of 24.4%. Cundinamarca is the fourth most populated Department in the country, it
has 945,401 total housing units (DANE, 2020) with a housing deficit or social gap of 29.71%,
which is 6.88 percentage points below the national level, and the State of Mexico is the state
with the largest population in Mexico, with a total of 4,481,007 housing units (INEGI, 2020)
of which 14.3% are identified with a housing deficit or social gap.
In Pacho-Cundinamarca, out of 8,856 total households, 44% have a housing deficit or social
backwardness (DANE, 2020); for Tlatlaya-State of Mexico, the total number of inhabited
private homes is 8,561, with which the housing deficit or social backwardness was estimated
at 62%. It is observed then, that in Tlatlaya-State of Mexico the deficiencies in homes are
greater than in Pacho-Cundinamarca.
Considering the above, for homes identified as having dirt floors (sand or mud), in Pacho-
Cundinamarca 439 homes of the total have this characteristic, likewise 626 homes of the total
in Tlatlaya-State of Mexico (INEGI, 2020). For public services it was evidenced that, for the
homes in Pacho 70.18% have Aqueduct, 92.19% Sewerage, and 96.55% Energy, the homes in
Tlatlaya 34.3% have piped water, 89.1% with Drainage 90.1% sanitary service and electric
energy 98.9%. These data can be seen in the following table:
Table 2. Similar variables between Tlatlaya-Mexico and Pacho-Colombia. Source: Own
elaboration based on data from INEGI (2020) and DANE (2020).
Variable
Category
Tlatlaya,
State of Mexico
Pacho,
Cundinamarca
Total households
8,561 households
8,856 households
Housing shortage or social backwardness
62%
44%
Mendieta, Bonilla 2022
October - December vol. 1. Num. 15, 2022
Floor material
Earth, Sand or Mud
7,31%
4,96%
Availability of
basic services
Piped water/ Aqueduct
34,3%
70,18%
Sewerage / Drainage
89,1%
92,19%
Electric power
98,90%
96,55%
The state of the construction systems of the houses in Pacho varies between those of great
design and those built with adobe, zinc roof tiles, cement floors and floors in earth, sand or
mud; in Tlatlaya their construction materials range from deteriorated materials such as
cardboard sheeting, reeds, bamboo or palm; In Tlatlaya, their construction materials range from
deteriorated materials such as cardboard, reed, bamboo, bamboo or palm; in mud or bajareque
and palm or straw to regular materials such as asbestos or metallic sheeting; wood, or tejamanil;
tile, for use in the construction of their homes in walls and roofs; in the municipal capital,
houses built with brick walls, brick and tile or sheet roofs predominate.
It should be noted that, in Colombia, there are no guidelines for building sustainable housing,
which according to the climate, recommendations are made taking into account the orientation
and its environment, unlike Mexico, which does have them with the sustainable housing
manuals, created by the National Housing Commission (CONAVI) this year, where the
concepts and the importance of applying the principles of sustainability in the design of housing
are recognized, starting from the reduction of energy consumption, water resource
management, materials and orientation. Undoubtedly, the need for the application of these
concepts is evident, also taking into account Conelly (2005): Rural houses built with
sustainable criteria are affordable, energy efficient, recycle the harvest, manufacture materials
responsibly, use less water, promote the health of their inhabitants, preserve the habitat and
ecosystems, promote the community, are of higher quality and are less costly to operate.
The housing policy for rural settlements needs to consider rural housing from a holistic
approach and with the characteristics that the inhabitants have configured according to the
activities and social interactions, requirements and specific conditions of a way of life, ensuring
that it is a dignified space, integrated to the territory and that it provides adequate conditions
for the well-being of its occupants (Acevedo Agudelo and Hurtado Sarmiento, 2022; and
Sánchez, De La Cruz-De La Cruz, López-Becerril, and Arana-Ovalle, 2021). A differentiated
treatment for rural housing is essential to implement public policies that effectively respond to
the needs, demands and way of life of rural communities (Garcia-Palacios and Moyano-
Estrada, 2020).
120
On the other hand, in Colombia the document CONPES 3919 in 2018: National Policy on
Sustainable Buildings, is among the most important steps taken by the country with respect to
the recognition of sustainable construction, seeking to promote the inclusion of sustainability
criteria established by the National Council for Economic and Social Policy of Colombia
(CONPES), in conjunction with the National Department of Population, which can only be
carried out if there is joint cooperation from each of the parties that make up the value chain of
the construction sector.
Conclusions
The data obtained from national, departmental or state and municipal surveys were classified,
achieving the qualification and quantification of housing deficiencies in the municipalities of
Pacho-Cundinamarca and Tlatlaya-State of Mexico. In this way, it was possible to identify the
technical aspects, construction systems and materials of housing in accordance with the
principles of sustainability, making it possible to establish or orient the design and construction
process, seeking to ensure that the housing has a lower associated environmental impact and
meets the needs of the population. Consequently, the importance of cultural factors and family
traditions was recognized in the construction of new housing, taking into account sustainable
aspects, since the purpose is that the inhabitants accept partial or total transformations of their
homes.
Finally, it is necessary to emphasize that this research was able to obtain guides or manuals for
sustainable housing, however, it is necessary to apply the principles of sustainability so that the
houses are decent, habitable and safe, in addition to being sustainable by optimizing natural
resources, and if these houses have everything necessary, their inhabitants would most likely
stay in the countryside.
References
Acevedo Agudelo, H. and Hurtado Sarmiento, Y. (2022). Decent and integrated rural habitats
in the Colombian territory. Reflections on the factors that favor their generation. Bitácora
Urbano Territorial, 32(I): 107-119. https://doi.org/ 10.15446/bitacora.v32n1.98481
Mayor's Office of the Municipality of Pacho (2020). Alcaldía municipal de pacho
Cundinamarca: plan de desarrollo municipal pacho somos todos. Http://www.pacho-
cundinamarca.gov.co/noticias/plan-de-desarrollo-municipal-pacho-somos-todos
Constitutional City Council of Tlatlaya (2022-2024). Physical media.
https://tlatlaya.gob.mx/tu-municipio/medio-fisico
Mendieta, Bonilla 2022
October - December vol. 1. Num. 15, 2022
Calla García, A. (2007). Validity of endogenous resources in the social production of rural
housing. Revista INVI, 22(60). doi:10.5354/0718-8358.2007.62129.
World Commission on Environment and Development (1988). Report of the World
Commission on Environment and Development.
https://www.ecominga.uqam.ca/PDF/BIBLIOGRAPHIE/GUIDE_LECTURE_1/CMM
AD-Informe-Comision-Brundtland-sobre-Medio-Ambiente-Desarrollo.pdf
CONAVI. (2021). Manuals of sustainable housing for different climates. 2021, by the
government of the state of Mexico. https://www.gob.mx/conavi/acciones-y-
programas/manuales-de-vivienda-sustentable-para-diversos-climas
Conelly, E. F. (2005). Getting started on green affordable housing. Rural Voices, 10(3), 6-7.
Consejo nacional de política económica y social república de colombia & departamento
nacional de planeación. (2018). National policy on sustainable buildings. Document
CONPES 3919.
Https://colaboracion.dnp.gov.co/cdt/conpes/econ%c3%b3micos/3919.pdf.
DANE. (2020). National population and housing census 2018. Dane information for all.
Https://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-tema/demografia-y-
poblacion/censo-nacional-de-poblacion-y-vivenda-2018
DANE. (2020b). Housing deficit. DANE information for all.
Https://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-tema/demografia-y-
poblacion/deficit-habitacional
Farfán, b. R. O., & Otero, e. R. (2015). Rural housing and the environment. Revista luna azul
(on line), (9-10), 1-de. Http://lunazul.ucaldas.edu.co/downloads/lunazul9_10_6.pdf.
Garcia-Palacios, E. and, Moyano-Estrada, E. (2020 ). Governance and territorial
development. Rural development agencies in the implementation of the Mexican SPFS
program. Ager- Journal of Studies on Depopulation and Rural Development. 2020(28),
pp. 185-215. DOI: 10.4422/ager.2019.14.
García Puentes, C. D., & Aristizábal Ocampo, M. (2020). Methodology of human-centered
design in rural housing: Case Vereda Calamaco- San Pablo de Borbur Colombia. Centro
Sur, 4(3), 32-47. https://doi.org/10.37955/cs.v4i3.88
Garcia-Puentes, C., Bernal-López, M. (2022). Theoretical approach to rural housing in the
province of Rionegro (Cundinamarca -Colombia). Corporación universitaria Minuto de
Dios-UNIMINUTO. Editorial Grupo Compás. In: II International Congress on Social
Responsibility, Innovations and emerging challenges for the care of the planet 2021, pp
260-296.
122
Gobernación Cundinamarca (2020). Gobernación Cundinamarca: departmental development
plan 2020-2024. Gobernación de Cundinamarca.
Http://www.cundinamarca.gov.co/home/secretariasentidades.gc/secretariadeplaneacion/
secretariadeplaneaciondespliegue/aspoliyplanprog_contenidos/csecreplanea__plandesar
rdep_2020_2023
INEGI (2020). Population and housing census 2020.
Http://cuentame.inegi.org.mx/monografias/informacion/mex/poblacion/default.aspx?te
ma=me&e=15
Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development (2012). Cartilla criterios ambientales
para el diseño y construcción de vivienda urbana (Environmental criteria for the design
and construction of urban housing). Minambiente. Retrieved from
https://www.minambiente.gov.co/images/asuntosambientalesysectorialyurbana/pdf/gest
ion_urbana/edificaciones_sostenibles/cartilla_criterios_ambientales_dise%c3%b1o_y_c
onstrucci%c3%b3n_de_vivienda_urbana.pdf
Ministry of Housing, City and Territory (2020). Política pública de vivienda de interés social
rural. Ministry of housing. Https://www.minvivienda.gov.co/sites/default/files/2020-
11/anexo-i.-politica-publica-de-vivienda-de-interes-social-rural.pdf
Olvera De La Cruz Miriam Monserrat, (2018). The human right to decent and harmonious
housing with the environment: a study with focus from indigenous peoples.
Http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11799/99640
Sánchez, F.J.Z., De La Cruz-De La Cruz, K.I., López-Becerril, I.D., Arana-Ovalle, R.I. (2021).
Rurality in Mexico, 1995-2015: Use in public policies. Latin American Profiles 29(57),
pp. 109-142. ISSN: 2309-4982. doi: dx.doi.org/10.18504/pl2957-005-2021.
Torres Veytia, E., Vega Díaz, L., & Higuera Meneses, C. (2011). The socio-spatial dimension
of rural housing in Mexico City. The case of the Milpa Alta Delegation. Revista INVI,
26(73), 201-223. Retrieved from
https://revistainvi.uchile.cl/index.php/INVI/article/view/62373/66222