Evaluation of the productivity and organoleptic characteristics of four Arabica coffee genotypes in Andil
Main Article Content
Abstract
Coffee is one of the main products grown in the southern part of Manabí. The objective of the study is to evaluate the productivity and organoleptic characteristics of four Arabica coffee genotypes (Sarchimor, Bourbon Rojo, Bourbon Amarillo, and Catuai). A completely randomised block design (CRBD) with five replicates was used, and Tukey's test at 5% was applied to identify the best performing treatments. In the organoleptic analysis, three processing methods were used per genotype: natural, honey and washed. In the production variables, the results did not show statistically significant differences between treatments, although Sarchimor recorded the highest productivity values and Bourbon Amarillo the lowest. In terms of granulometry, Sarchimor had larger dimensions in ripe fruit (length: 14.08 mm; width: 14.02 mm; thickness: 11.96 mm). In green coffee, no significant differences were observed; however, Sarchimor stood out with the highest proportion in the 15 mm sieve and good flotation performance (5.90%). In Brix degrees, Bourbon Rojo obtained the highest sucrose content (26.3), while no statistical differences were found in seed classification. In terms of organoleptic analysis, the natural and honey Sarchimor treatments achieved the highest scores (82.5), while washed Bourbon Rojo obtained the lowest rating (78.3). In conclusion, the Sarchimor genotype, combined with the natural and honey processing methods, showed a favourable balance between yield and cup quality, establishing itself as a viable alternative for producers seeking differentiated coffees.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Material appearing in the journal may be reproduced and cited, provided that it complies with the conditions established in the licenses of the published articles Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Alomia-Lucero, J. M., & Untiveros-Soldevilla, C. M. (2021). Washed, honey and natural processing of Coffea arabica L. catimor variety beans on physical and organoleptic quality, Satipo - Peru. Revista Investigación Agraria, 3(2), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.47840/reina.3.2.1097
Álvarez Andrade, A. D. (2025). "Productive and organoleptic evaluation of three Arabica coffee genotypes in three types of processing [Universidad Estatal del Sur de Manabí]. https://repositorio.unesum.edu.ec/bitstream/53000/8000/1/Alvarez%20Andrade%20Arela%20Dolores.pdf
Buendía-Espinoza, J. C., Maldonado-Torres, R., Amador-Atlahua, L., & Álvarez-Sánchez, M. E. (2020). Identification of discriminatory elements to characterise Coffea arabica L. using principal components. Mexican Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 11(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.29312/REMEXCA.V11I1.2207
Cañarte-Vélez, C. R., Cañarte-Vélez, C. R., Valverde-Lucio, Y. A., & Mero-Tuárez, J. R. (2021). Sensory characteristics of coffee (Coffea arabica) with different wet processing treatments. Polo Del Conocimiento, 6(1), 445–463. https://doi.org/10.23857/pc.v6i1.2152
Córdova Dina, Espinosa Kleber, Cedeño Maria, & Chilan William. (2025). Agronomic response of two Arabica coffee genotypes (Coffea arabica) Sarchimor 1669 and Manabí 01. KOSMOS, 4, 274–282. https://editorialinnova.com/index.php/rck/article/view/202/572
Farfán-Valencia, F. (2020). Coffee crop management in agroforestry systems – SAF. In Agronomic Management of Coffee Production Systems (pp. 72–123). Cenicafé. https://doi.org/10.38141/10791/0002_3
García Zavaleta, J., Quintero Fuentes, M., Bautista Sánchez, R., & Mendoza Loyo, O. (2025). Agronomic factors in the cultivation and production of Arabica coffee in Zongolica, Veracruz. 593 Digital Publisher CEIT, 10(1), 652-667. https://doi.org/10.33386/593dp.2025.1
Guevara, Y. (2023). Quantitative characterisation of the cup quality of rust-resistant coffee varieties. Café Cacao, 22, //cu-id.com/0356/v22e01. https://www.cafecacao.edicionescervantes.com/index.php/cafecacao/article/view/283/235
Herrera, F., Arriaga, M., & Rivera, C. (2023). Mexican coffee: Production, market and public policy. Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture, 1, 1–39. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Celso-Rodrigo-Rivera-Rojo/publication/373830206_Cafe_mexiquense_Produccion_mercado_y_politica_publica/links/64ff2dec25ee6b7564e11d77/Cafe-mexiquense-Produccion-mercado-y-politica-publica.pdf#page=236
Jadan Sánchez, V. M., Belduma Pizarro, N. A., & Elizalde Orellana, M. V. (2024). Evolution and projection of agricultural production (bananas and coffee) in Ecuador in the period 2012-2025. InveCom Magazine, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.10850807
Jiménez Buri, K. A., Quezada, J. M., & Vega Granda, A. del C. (2023). Analysis of coffee exports in Ecuador, 2017-2021 period. Ciencia Latina - Multidisciplinary Journal, 7, 6166. https://ciencialatina.org/index.php/cienciala/article/view/4909/7457
Juárez González, T., Maldonado Astudillo, Y. I., González Mateos, R., Ramírez Sucre, M. O., Álvarez Fitz, P., & Salazar, R. (2021). Physicochemical and sensory characterisation of coffee from the mountains of Guerrero. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas, 12(6), 1057–1069. https://doi.org/10.29312/REMEXCA.V12I6.2773
Julca Otiniano, A., Alvarado Huamán, L., Borjas Ventura, R., Castro Cepero, V., León Rojas, F., Valderrama Palacios, D., & Bello Amez, S. (2023). Coffee varieties (Coffea arabica), a review and some experiences in Peru. Journal of Agricultural and Natural Resource Research and Innovation, 10(2), 134–155. https://doi.org/10.53287/RUYX4519VM15B
Leroy, T., Ribeyre, F., Bertrand, B., Charmetant, P., Dufour, M., Montagnon, C., Marraccini, P., & Pot, D. (2006). Genetics of coffee quality. In Braz. J. Plant Physiol, 18(1).
Maldonado Espejo, Z., Maldonado Fuentes, C., Catari Quispe, P., & Agrónomo, I. (2024). Different forms of fermentation on the quality of coffee (Coffea arabica L.) Sapecho Experimental Station . Apthapi, 10(1), 2651–2660. https://doi.org/10.53287/XFPV4722BR94C
Mendoza, B., Pincay, J., & Bravo, R. (2023). Influence of ripe and green coffee harvesting on the physical and organoleptic quality of coffee (Coffea arabica L.). Agrosilvicultura y Medioambiente Journal, 1. https://revistas.unesum.edu.ec/agricultura/index.php/ojs/article/view/2/8
Merino Osejos, M. A., Andrade Cano, R. J., & Conforme Merino, M. V. (2021). Coffee quality and its impact on humans in the Jipijapa canton. RECIMUNDO, 5(Special 1), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.26820/recimundo/5 (Special 1). Nov. 2021. 231–242.
Muñoz Belalcazar, J. A., Burbano R., P. Y., Valencia A., A. L., & Lagos-Burbano, T. C. (2021). Yield components in Coffea arabica L. in three altitudinal zones in southern Colombia. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Research, 13(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.22490/21456453.4350
Muñoz Borja, S. (2022). Process improvement in Peruvian organic coffee production using a life cycle approach [Pontifical Catholic University of Peru]. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/circulars/coffee.pdf
Payehuanca, E. (2024). Determination of the organoleptic profile of two varieties of coffee (Coffea arabica L.) subjected to different fermentation points [National University of the Altiplano]. https://repositorio.unap.edu.pe/bitstream/handle/20.500.14082/21748/Payehuanca_Quispe_Edith.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y
SCAA Protocols | Cupping Specialty Coffee. (n.d.).
National Secretariat for Planning and Development. (2023). Update of the development and land use plan. https://es.scribd.com/document/478961755/1360000630001-PDYOT-JIPIJAPA-14042016-14-04-2016-10-45-27-pdf
Vidal Tejeda, C. A., Julca Otiniano, A., Castro Cepero, V., Alvarado Huaman, L., & Borjas Ventura, R. R. (2023). Physical and physiological attributes of coffee seeds (Coffea arabica L). Siembra, 10(2), e4523. https://doi.org/10.29166/SIEMBRA.V10I2.4523
Yoza Chango, A., & Regalado García, O. (2021). Analysis of the competitiveness of coffee exports from Ecuador versus Colombia and Brazil to the US market. X-Pedientes Económicos, 5(12), 65–80.